Comment on our times
More dangerous then Guns: FRAMES
1st written for the Academy of Video Arts and Sciences and the Lake Superior Sounder in 2003.
by : Bill Rebane
What the heck are frames?
When the moral majority and conservatives speak ill of Hollywood, the public at large has not a clue of what they are talking about or what the fuss is all about. At the same time the anti gun lobby screams, “Guns Kill People” while at the very same time the public at large takes entertainment as just that .”Entertainment”. Never ever realizing that each little image and scene represents something deadlier then a “Gun.” Each little frame is a subliminal image that can be far deadlier then Guns.
Yes, “frames” refer to motion picture film frames, movie film frames or digital video frames which cumulative take up all of today’s movie fare and television programming. These frames are counted at 24 frames per second on movie film or 30 frames per second in the digital or television medium which ultimately represent trillions upon trillions of individual little subliminal messages. Some if not too many indelibly imprinted in the viewers conscious or unconscious mind forever.
The legendary movie tycoon Samuel Goldwyn once said: “if you want to send messages, use Western Union, movies are for entertainment.” Was Goldwyn right or wrong?
As a young man, I once met Samuel Goldwyn, while having dinner with Zsa Zsa Gabor, and Chicago Tribune columnist Herb Lyon at the Ambassador East Hotel in Chicago. I was a fledgling want to be film maker at that time. Yet, even then in the mind of this writers humble opinion Goldwyns statement, was categorically wrong.
When voicing to Mr. Goldwyn that his famous statement was just that “Wrong,” he snapped back, “what do you mean young man?” With a flushed red face I attempted to hide my embarrassment and underlying fear of having said too much. Never the less, the unexpected statement came from my lips. “I thought every little frame of film is a message Mr. Goldwyn.” My comeback was totally ignored, but by myself never forgotten. Mr. Goldwyn was just plain wrong. Then as well as today.
From the earliest days of movie making, Movies, (film frames) have influenced audiences. Entertained them, made them cry, made them happy, made them think and provided information to them. Irrespective of how, who or what tools by way of “images” were used, in the creation of such film frames. The unbelievable power Hollywood has created for itself can be good, but, can also be extremely dangerous. Whatever appears on film frames is the creation and responsibility of the people behind the cameras, producing the images.
Hollywood is no longer the Hollywood that maintains a self imposed moral code of ethics as it did during Hollywood’s Golden Age, the twenties through the nineteen fifties. Today, Hollywood has gone mad. Under the guise of “Entertainment,” it churns out motion pictures at the rate of some 300 plus per year, some good, some really bad, never the less, this represents again trillions of little film frame messages, that have and still do, influence the minds of young and old all over the globe. Can there be any doubt of the impact of Movies when looking at Mel Gibsons “The Passions?” or other huge successes or epics ? Or maybe, “Chainsaw Massacre,” “Blood Feast,” etc. etc. ? The proof is the pudding.
Add to this equation the digital games. More Frames. of violence, Killing and more violence. What can one expect. ? More murder and mayhem. And then we wonder about heinous crimes, more murder or mayhem……….
The moral of the story is, what produces more damage,. Guns? or Film Frames? People behind the guns can kill people. The people behind the movies can kill young minds, destroy lives, ruin political careers, as well as promote mayhem and murder, if not revolutions on a global basis. What then is more dangerous?
Permission to reprint is hereby granted, with appropriate credit due to author.

Copyright © 2008 – 2010 by Bill Rebane

E-mail feedback!

Bookmark the permalink.

5 Comments

  1. オークリーサングラスされている得たモデル、品質、グッチサングラス 複雑な彼らの に知られている特定は現在 の良い評判を名前を付けます。オークリーのサングラスのために現実的なお手頃実際には高価な値札、しかし、質の高い作品は、多くの場合、機能同行が付属していをとに起因この特定、偽のオークリーのサングラスの上昇が市場に 。することができるという著しく |代替ソリューション|代替の安い価格は、によって選ばれた別の解決策たくさんの多くのお客さま|多大|たくさんの|たくさんの。
    より多くグッチサングラス の兆候はまだあり助けには区別本格的とシェード。しかし、おそらく賢いことについて移動する 文字通り自分自身で問題を置くことによって、 手をする可能性があります。単に保持することによりあなたいずれかが偽であるとどのような種類-からは脂肪、採用、滑らかな仕上げ、オークリーのロゴ、および品質計画。はい、これらのペア視力は、いくつかの本物のOakleyのサングラスを自分のペアを取得うまくいきません。
    重量特定オークリー サングラス 人気 フレーム:本物のオークリーのフレームはしばしば高品質の合金または金属のようにすることを生産彼らが重くなり、その偽オークリーサングラスその考える考慮して以下と使用材料を含むのように、アルミニウム、プラスチック、安価な金属も同様に。

  2. I simply want to tell you that I am just all new to blogging and site-building and really savored your web-site. Very likely I’m going to bookmark your blog post . You definitely have beneficial writings. Many thanks for sharing with us your website.

  3. I simply want to mention I’m all new to blogging and certainly enjoyed this web-site. More than likely I’m going to bookmark your blog . You surely come with tremendous posts. Thank you for sharing your blog.

  4. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

Leave a Reply